Posts Tagged ‘HR’

  • Remembering Retention

    0

    While you can (and most are) debate whether the recession is actually ‘over,’ I would caution employers against exhaling too soon. If you’re like most, you’ve been looking at employees through the lens of cost-cutting and termination. Times are changing and it’s time to look through the lens of retention.

    I would argue you should never shift focus away from retention, but this is perhaps for another blog post. The reality is that retention has simply not been a priority for most businesses in the past 18 months and that needs to change.

    An extraordinary legacy of the recent economic downturn is its creation of a new kind of employee; one who has seen, felt and experienced first-hand the trauma of working inside an organization when the economic world outside is crumbling. These employees are the witnesses. The survivors. And while they’ve been seriously disgruntled for months now (Great Recessions will do that), they’ve stuck around because of limited options elsewhere.

    That’s changing.

    Now, as the economic storm is ending, companies are hiring again. And so the fear of unemployment which held your workforce together is fading (it may be already gone). Your employees are polishing their resumes, getting in touch with contacts, sharpening their interview skills, and emotionally have one foot out the door. They’ve just been waiting for the skies to clear and for the storm to pass.

    And – of the utmost importance to understand — they’re not doing this out of disloyalty. They’re doing this because they aren’t happy (to put it mildly) with what they saw, or how they were treated.

    That means, frankly, that some of your best performers – the ones you kept — are poised to walk out the door, take their knowledge capital with them, and leave you with the costs of hiring and training new staff.

    Your challenge? Stop this scenario before it happens by implementing smart retention strategies that work.

    The Retention Strategies

    The old “3-R’s” of realistic expectations, rewards and recognition all still matter, and not even a Great Recession can shake that.

    Yet in addition to these staples of retention wisdom, you need to modify your approach in light of what has transpired in the workforce; both in your unique workplace, and in the overall sector/market.

    Below are four best practices that can shape and direct your retention efforts.

    • Communicate effectively and honestly. Times have been tough and stress has influenced your’s and your colleagues’ behaviour in a lot of undesirable (okay, ugly) ways. Now that things are calmer and cooler, don’t behave as if “nothing happened.” Talk about decisions with your employees; explain some of the reasons behind them, and be open about where the company is and where it’s going.
    • Accept responsibility (or at least take ownership) of regrettable actions. If your employees respond to your authentic communication efforts with sadness or anger, take it – own up to it. Your goal is to leave as little room for rumour and fear as possible.  If you — or your company, of which you were the unlucky representative — made decisions which weren’t “employee friendly” (you know the ones we’re talking about), the blunt fact is you can’t do much to make up for that. The wound is there; it can’t be undone. However, you can and should own up to the actions and be prepared to accept some unhappy, hurt, and angry responses.
    • Focus on supervisor-employee relationships.  Broad retention strategies have their place, but the relationship between an employee and his/her boss is what really counts. One of the cruelest consequences of the economic turmoil has been an erosion of personal relationships and trust. By fostering supervisor-employee relationships, you help restore this bond – and keep a valued employee from leaving for greener pastures.
    • Focus on compensation.  Many non-financial factors influence retention and you should focus on those. However, don’t delude yourself into thinking they replace compensation. They merely enhance it. In short: compensation matters. If it’s time for you to give employees a bump or a bonus, now is the time to do it.

    Context is Everything

    In closing, remember: while these practices are all good ideas under any circumstances, your challenge is to apply them in context of what has transpired over the past months. So in other words, if after reading the best practices above you figure that you’re “doing all of this stuff already and have been for years,” then re-visit this belief and ask yourself: am I modifying these to reflect the new, post-recession labour market reality?

    Chances are, you aren’t.

    However, that’s no cause for alarm – not yet. Because you’ve identified a critical retention issue in your company before it becomes an expensive, time consuming and possibly un-solvable problem. That’s something to feel good about.

    Your clear top priority now is to implement retention strategies that work and make sense in the new “recession aftermath” world. Be assured: it can be done, and the sooner you start, the safer, stronger, and more successful your company will be.

  • The DIY Culture: Not for HR

    2
    DIY Portraits

    Have we become the do it yourself (DIY) generation? Have we been sold on a philosophy that I can do pretty much anything as good as the experts?

    Just look at the growth in DIY retailing….. home furnishings and hardware stores that have sprung up in the last decade:  Home Depot, Lowes; the increase in DIY instructional magazines and videos; and the new DIY Network cable channel.

    What has driven this phenomenon?  Where did it come from? Likely it originates out of the sense of accomplishment to be derived from ‘doing it yourself.’ It’s about taking ownership. It is about self-reliance. It’s also likely a bit ego driven.

    For most people it is also about cost.

    There is a belief that there are significant cost savings in doing things yourself.  However, I would wager that for every person that was able to pull off redoing their washroom at home there are far more who failed or ended up spending more personal time and money than anticipated.

    The DIY retailers sell you the raw materials, the instructions and the tools to undertake a project but they are missing the most important ingredients of planning, experience and expertise.

    Not everything can be DIY.

    For example, you require an electrician to certify the work you have done or your home insurance may be null in void in the event of an electrical fire.

    Similarly why put your organization at risk thinking that you can handle very technical components of your business, like HR. Anyone can handle the transactional aspect of HR such as benefit administration but it requires true experience and skill to handle a mass layoff or prevent a union drive from succeeding. HR is not a DIY.

  • Key Drivers to Outsource HR

    0

    With 2009 coming to a close, many small businesses across Canada are starting to feel the effects of a turbulent year ease off, and they’re starting to look for ways to reign in costs and prepare for better days in 2010.  A hot trend in the small business market is Human Resources Outsourcing.  According to Hewitt Associations, a global provider of HR consulting services and research, the most common reason for outsourcing HR is to reduce overhead.  This is achieved by using the HRO firm’s economies-of-scale for things such as benefit products, HR infrastructure, or payroll systems.

    Size Counts

    Economies of scale are the primary method an HRO firm can reduce a business’ operational costs.  By pooling several businesses together, HRO firms aggregate needs for benefits, advice and legal expertise.  Additionally, they can manage routine HR tasks more efficiently as the talent and infrastructure is already in place.  When a small business joins the HRO firm, they simply access these existing programs at reduced rates and a minimal investment of time.  They can jump onto the HRO’s programs and platforms with little start-up time or expense, and can hit the ground running.

    Other reason to outsource human resources include:

    • Access to outside expertise
    • Improving service quality
    • Ability to focus on core expertise
    • High cost of remaining compliant with rapidly changing legislation
    • Eliminate high volume of low-value transactional activities
    • Reduce management distractions away from core business
    • Leverage existing staff to focus on key competencies
    • Reduce transaction costs

    Expanding into Canada

    Outsourcing is also a strategic advantage for foreign companies entering the Canadian market.  An HRO firm can quickly adopt a business’ policies to be compliant with Canadian legislation to on-board staff and efficiently pay their Canadian employees without any headaches.

    The H.R.O.I.

    Studies show once HR operations are outsourced, many companies show a strong return on investment.  IDC, a global provider of market intelligence, conducted a survey of executives and reported almost 85 percent of respondents saved as much as they spent on outsourcing.  And the savings, according to 95 percent of the respondents, went toward operational performance and innovation.  Check out some of our testimonials.

  • 4 Considerations Before Using a Bring-Your-Own-Computer to Work Program

    0

    High angle view of a young man sitting on a couch and using a laptop

    ITBusinessEdge wrote a great piece yesterday, Employeed-Owned Computer Programs: Diving into Murky Waters which brings up an interesting trend in the workplace and raises some potential legal, security and HR issues.  A “BYOC” program could be a fantastic way for businesses to save money, improve employee performance and engagement, etc, but here’s 4 implications to consider first:

    1. Who “owns” the data? Make sure all employees are covered under data ownership agreements, that state all work-related data and applications are the property of the company.  And at the time of termination, etc that transfer and erasure of the data must be witnessed and verified by the internal IT resources.  Update and utilize intellectual property and confidentiality agreements.
    2. A Security Blackhole?! Provide all your staff with security and anti-virus programs, and conduct occasional audits to verify proper security measures are in place.  Include a security agreement stating the employee will take all necessary and mandated precautions.
    3. Who owns the laptop? Your company puts in a couple grand, but the employee bought it, so then who owns it?  Before the employee gets the money, require a “graduated pay-back” of the funds.  For example, each month represents $200 depreciation of the funds – so if you gave $2000 and the employee leaves 6 months later, they owe back $800.  Check with your accountant for the best way to handle it.  Utilize a waiver to satisfy any employment standards requirements regarding pay deductions.
    4. Make it a choice.  Allow employees the option of a company provided computer or participating in a BYOC program.  Some employees may not be interested in purchasing another computer.
  • The Implications of Rehiring an Employee

    0
    Businessman

    Many companies rehire employees who have worked for them in the past.  Typically, they have a “Re-employment Policy” which details the privileges that will be re-instated (i.e. benefits, vacation, and seniority).  However, they may not have considered the obligation regarding severance pay should the renewed relationship not work out.

    The company is required to pay severance for broken periods of service when they add up to five (5) years or more (if severance is applicable).  For example, if an employee had worked previously for the company for 2 years, resigned and was away for 2 years, rehired and worked for another 4 years and then the employee is terminated, he/she would be entitled to severance based on the combined service – therefore, 6 years (the 2 years previously employed plus the current 4 years of employment).  Notice would just be required on the current employment period of 4 years (therefore, 4 weeks of working notice or pay).   Under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 minimums, the total termination pay would be four (4) weeks of notice and six (6) weeks’ severance (if applicable).   In addition, it doesn’t matter how long the break in service is or the reason the employee left initially (quit or termination).  So rehiring an employee can mean taking on a potential severance liability.

    Some suggestions when considering an employee for re-hire include:

    • Insuring that the employee’s qualifications meet the requirements of the vacant position;
    • Confirming that he/she had been in good standing at the time of departure;
    • Reviewing the privileges you may consider reinstating (benefits, vacation, etc.) as there is no legal obligation to do so;
    • Clearly outlining all terms in the new offer letter.
  • Changes in Small Claims Court

    0
    We recently had a record-breaking (for us anyway) attendance to our webinar: “Wrongful Dismissal and the Changes to the Rules of Court.”  Its also a topic we blogged about a couple weeks back, and I’d like to share some of the highlights from the webinar with you.
    First some background to bring us up to speed.  On January 1, 2010 the Rules of Court for small claims will be changing in Canada.  Here is a brief highlight of the changes:
    1.  Claims doubled from $25k to $50k
    2.  Damages doubled from $50k to $100k
    3.  Simplified procedures are also being introduced for more cases
    In other words, more cases can be processed in Small Claims Court, which don’t require a lawyer, and they will be subject to an enhanced Simplified Procedure.  That means less time for discovery and faster judgements.  All of whihc adds up to a lower cost barrier for disgrunlted employees to sue their former employers for wrongful dismissal cases, etc.
    So although these rules mean Canadian business could get hauled off to court more often and have bigger judgements against them, they still have plenty of options to keep these costs/risks to a minimum.
    1.  Have termination clauses included in all employment contracts (they need to be specific to each employee, and must meet legal minimum standards)
    2.  Have an employee handbook with policies you preach and practice!  (Paper trails are your best friend)
    3.  Don’t be a jerk when it comes time to terminate.  Play fair, play nice, and have a little heart.

    We recently had a record-breaking (for us anyway) attendance to our webinar: “Wrongful Dismissal and the Changes to the Rules of Court.”  Its also a topic we blogged about a couple weeks back, and I’d like to share some of the highlights from the webinar with you.

    First some background to bring us up to speed.  On January 1, 2010 the Rules of Court for small claims will be changing in Canada.  Here is a brief highlight of the changes:

    1. Small Claims court limits have increased from 10K to $25k
    2. Damages doubled from $50k to $100k for claims under the Simplified Procedure rule
    3. Other changes to the Simplified procedures rule are being introduced to speed up claims and reduce costs for claimants

    In other words, more cases will be processed in Small Claims Court, which don’t require a lawyer, costs will be reduced for a disgruntled employee to pursue a claim against their employer.  And now more claims (up to 100K) can now be pursued under the simplified procedure rule that was previously reserved for claims up to 50K.  The additional changes to this rule relating to motions for summary judgement, timeframes for discovery, etc will further speed up the legal process for employees who want to “have their day in court.”

    These rule changes mean Ontario business could potentially get hauled off to court more often and have bigger judgements awarded against them.  However, employers still have plenty of options to keep these costs/risks to a minimum.

    1. Tighten up your employment contracts.  Beyond including confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and IP agreements – have termination clauses included that are specific to each employee, and meet legal minimum standards.
    2. Have an employee handbook with policies you preach and practice!  (Paper trails are your best friend)
    3. As Elvis said, “Don’t be cruel”  when it comes time to terminate.  Play fair, play nice, and have a little heart.

    Give us a shout if you would like some assistance preparing you business for these changes

  • Resignation vs. Termination Notice

    2

    Recently, a client contacted me with the following question:

    “If an employee has provided 2 ½ months notice for resignation but we don’t require (or want) him here for more than two weeks – how do we handle it legally?”

    The answer is that it depends on the employee’s service with the company but it is the lesser of the resignation notice or the termination pay that would be owed under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 minimums.  For example, if the employee has 2 years of service, you would owe 2 weeks pay under Employment Standards (rather than 2 ½ months) because in essence you are terminating his employment (see section 56 subsection (1)(a) of the Act).  However, if the employee has 10 years of service, you may be obligated to pay the 2 ½ months (or continue to have the employee work for this period of time).  If severance is applicable, then the employee would be entitled to 8 weeks notice and 10 weeks of severance.  Therefore, the 2 ½ months of resignation notice would be less.  If severance is not applicable, then the employee would be entitled to 8 weeks notice only which would be less than the resignation notice of 2 ½ months.  You would be terminating his employment and paying (or having him work) the 8 weeks of notice.

    So, the next time you have an employee submit a resignation letter with a significant notice period, double check his/her service date!

  • Employers and the Cellphone Ban: Who pays for the fine?

    0

    The cellphone ban has been in effect in Ontario for little over a month now, and maybe its just me but I’ve had a lot less road rage.  Drivers seem to be more attentive, and those chatting on their cellphones sure are getting a lot of dirty looks – this is when they pay attention to the road around them.

    We’ve gotten a lot of traffic on our post: “5 Responses Employers Should Do for the Cellphone Ban” where we discussed updating policies, signing agreements, providing hands-free devices, etc.  So we wanted to follow-up with and discuss some of the consequences of failing to comply with the ban, and in particular take a look at the employer/employee dynamic adding to the complexity of “who pays.”

    Who pays for an accident or property damage where your employee/driver was on a cellphone?

    Well your insurance company isn’t going to be too happy with this scenario, particularly if you haven’t taken any steps to address cellphone usage with your employee.  The insurance company is likely not to pay for the accident, and if they do your premiums are going to get hit hard.  Secondly any time loss as a result of injury and/or court time will be hitting your bottom line as well.

    Since this legislation is still new and not yet tested out in the courts, answers to all the scenarios are still unclear.  In particular, its not clear if accidents will be covered by WSIB if an employee is driving the vehicle, talking on the phone, while on a work assignment at the time of the incident.

    So play it safe, stress the importance of safe and legal driving practices.  Provide hands-free devices, update your policies and require signatures from your employees as proof they understand the policy and will perform in accordance.

  • Employment Accessibility Standard Coming to Ontario

    0

    The recently released Final Proposed Employment Accessibility Standard for the AODA will have a significant impact on every employer in Ontario. The goal of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (AODA) is to make Ontario accessible to people with disabilities by 2025, to be achieved by

    “developing, implementing and enforcing accessibility standards in order to achieve accessibility for Ontarians with disabilities with respect to goods, services, facilities, accommodation, employment, buildings, structures and premises on or before January 1, 2025.”

    The Accessibility Standards for Customer Service, Ontario Regulation 429/07 was the first standard to become law, on January 1, 2008.

    The AODA is the first law of it’s kind in Canada and is similar to the Americans with Disabilities Act in the US.  Though not yet law, if adopted in the current form, the act will have a significant impact on every employment related practice from recruitment to termination.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

Page 1 of 3123»
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes